Talk:Till the World Ends/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ashliveslove (talk · contribs) 11:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Started reviewing the article. ASHU^IND 11:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

• Review

1. No disambiguation links found till date.
2. Layout, grammar and everything else checks out fine.
3. Have decided to put on hold until reply from nominator for following problems.

• Problems

1. Citation problem found. Please correct it.

1.  Done
2. Again there is one citation problem left, maybe left in a recent edit. Check reference no. 59.
3. What's the problem with the link? It works fine and the reference is well-formatted.

1. Saw edit wars in log between SmoLu and Xwomanizerx between July 21 - July 26. Was this resolved?

1. Yes, that was four months ago...

Ohk. Just wanted to make sure that other reviewers don't object over the same reason.

1. Found dead links. Have tagged them in article. Please remove or correct them.

1. Removed both.

Xwomanizerx (talk) 01:47, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

• Comment

I think images of Keaha and Nicki are unnecessary in Remix section of the article. A inter-wiki link to their article is sufficient. It lessens the view of article to a great deal and many people are familiar with both the artists. ASHU^IND 20:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Pictures are most welcome for identification as long as they are free. A song article can have a picture of a rose in the Composition section of the lyrics mention about a rose. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 13:04, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

I suggest the picture is moved to the right. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 13:07, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

That quote above that picture box should be in a quotebox. Will make it highlighted from the general writing standards. ASHU^IND 06:33, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Wait, who told you that? Why should it be in a quote box? We recommend usage of a blockquote. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 06:58, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Ahh, sry about that. Was not remembering the correct word 'blockquote'. By-the-way is anyone improving the article or are we just uselessly commenting back? ASHU^IND 12:07, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

It's okay. Try to talk to him. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 12:42, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

So, is that it? Xwomanizerx (talk) 15:52, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Final Analysis

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Yes. ASHU^IND 10:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No such concerns here. Article has been searched thoroughly for such references Some problems were found and resolved. ASHU^IND 10:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   All such aspects have been covered. ASHU^IND 10:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Fine here. Well balanced. ASHU^IND 10:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Issues were there but was resolved. ASHU^IND 10:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. ASHU^IND 10:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Keep up the good quality of Article. Don't let it delisted.
Regards.
ASHU^IND 10:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)