Talk:Tilden's Laws of Robotics

New Kid

This is my first attempt to contribute to wikipedia, so please be kind to the new kid. The article has been marked as "non-notable, outside a narrow interest group or constituency, or should be because of its particular importance or impact."

I simply don't see how this can be the case. I only created the page because I was surprised to find that wikipedia didn't already have such an entry. I created a seperate entry because Asimov's laws have their own article outside of the main Isaac Asimov page.

Can anyone shed some light on the subject?

(I removed the note because I disagreed with the non-noteble thing)DalekSec 17:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Non-notable" seems to get tossed around quite a bit here, as a euphemism for who knows what. Just dredge up some legitimate references and you'll be fine. Salad Days 07:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Idea

This just revealed itself to me.

A human being must protect its existence at all costs.
A human being must obtain and maintain access to its own power source.
A human being must continually search for better power sources.

Here is Man, creating robot in his image and likeness. Soulrefrain (Talk) 00:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could it be, that Matrix robots were following these three instead of the Asimov three? 84.50.20.95 (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robotics attention needed

Assess merge

Chaosdruid (talk) 09:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remove?

From what I can tell, only Tilden and his mother knows these laws. I recommend remove. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antepali (talk • contribs) 10:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]