Talk:Tilburg

	Netherlands portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
	This article is supported by Dutch municipalities task force (assessed as High-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Islam controversy

I don't see what the opinion of the imam adds to the description of the city, so I deleted the part about the Islam controversy. Poor edited and no referenced, that orphan sentence seemed to be meant to instigate racism in the reader. I guess it was just plain vandalism. --Gio' 17:57, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mayor

Peter Noordanus is now the mayor of Tilburg. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.93.64.100 (talk) 10:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glaasje schrobbeler.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Glaasje schrobbeler.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Glaasje schrobbeler.png)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation?

In July 2012, multiple pictures have been deleted due to suspected copyright violations. However, in my humblemost opinion, photos from a church, a university building (both from the outside and so visible to everyone in daily life) and the funfair are essential to see what a city has to offer and thus shouldn't be removed nor copyrighted. I think the deletion of these files were a bit excessive and only decreases the experience of this article, don't you think? I know Tilburg-bashing is a common phenomenom, but please don't show your frustrations on Wikipedia by removing innocent pictures! --OPolkruikenz (talk) 09:35, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Tilburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:47, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Tilburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

De heuvel in Tilburg.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:38, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interactive map

Clicking the "Interactive map outlining Tilburg" results in a full screen version of a map that is positioned with latitude and longitude both being zero (not the correct 51°33′N 5°5′E). --FredTC (talk) 08:52, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It shows the correct location for me. Do you see the same incorrect full-screen location when clicking on the maps of Boston or New York City? - Tristan Surtel (talk) 11:29, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now it shows correct. Earlier this morning it was wrong. I tried it in several browsers and it was wrong in all of them. Now I tried again and it is OK everywhere. I tried to see the results of template "infobox mapframe" for random selected articles, among which was Tilburg. I did this because two interactive maps that are in the Niigata (city) article had that problem. The problem still exists with Niigata. --FredTC (talk) 11:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bareld van der Veen 2A02:A211:23C1:EF00:256D:8332:68D2:5470 (talk) 21:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]