Talk:Tiffany (Image Comics)

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Untitled

The Other Hellspawn slayers section is getting a little bit out of hand, especially since it's duplicated in the Angela page, which mean any edits need to be duplicated in two articles. Perhaps a "Hellspawn slayer" page would be more appropriate? It would clear up the Angela and Tiffany pages, and it could still link to individual pages, as well as give more detailed information on lesser-known Hellspawn slayers. Any objections/thoughts?
Drewcifer3000 20:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of references/original research

It seems kind of silly to single out this article as not citing its sources. After all, it is a comic, and non of the other Spawn-related character pages provide references. References are kind of implied from the comics, right? As for the claim of original research, I would argue the same. I'm not even sure which part(s) are being claimed as original research. These points seem kind of moot to me, so unless someone cares to disagree, I'll remove the lack of citations and original research notes.Drewcifer3000 23:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tiffany (adv)2.jpg

Image:Tiffany (adv)2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tiffany (comics).jpg

Image:Tiffany (comics).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]