Talk:Tic-tac (horse racing)

Gambling Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Horse racing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horse racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Horse racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horse racingWikipedia:WikiProject Horse racingTemplate:WikiProject Horse racingHorse racing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Verlan

"For example, 4-1 is known as rouf (four backwards)."

Anyone else spot a problem here? 81.159.121.205 18:00, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be a trade-off: simply spelling words backwards sometimes results in unpronounceable or awkward combinations. In Verlan (the French equivalent of backslang), the order of syllables is reversed. See [1]. Pingku 03:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

... would be great! Maikel (talk) 10:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tic-tac. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150930123538/http://www.promo-code.co.uk/a-guide-to-tic-tac/ to http://promo-code.co.uk/a-guide-to-tic-tac/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 February 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved and redirect target changed. (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 07:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tic-tac → Tic-tac (horse racing) – Make Tic-tac a primary redirect to Tic Tac, which appears to be the more likely primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 18:40, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per nom. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:21, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rreagan007 (talk) 22:32, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Randy Kryn (talk) 13:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support the mint could easily be generic for those that don't know its a brand. The mint has 8,187 views compared with only 645[[2]] for this one. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.