Talk:Thyroid hormone receptor

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2019 and 29 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Arizzo0226.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Thyroid hormone receptor/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

A reference to the fact that thyroid hormone receptors are always located in the nucleus vs. all other steroid type hormone receptors which are located both in nucleus and cytoplasm ought to be included as this is a fundamental difference in these receptors. Also that thyroid hormone receptors are constitutively bound to DNA without being bound to ligands (thyroid hormone). Nairwin (talk) 16:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 16:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 08:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

What is the article's overall status? It seems like it's complete and understandable.

What are the article's strengths? It addresses information about what the hormone is, how it functions and how it impacts people when it's mutated or not functioning which provides a general audience with a full spectrum of information all in one place. How can the article be improved? I think updating the sources would be a start. How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Well- developed. KNavarra (talk) 19:13, 30 January 2020 (UTC)knavarra[reply]

How can the article be improved? More recent sources could be added, as well as a structural diagram (perhaps for alpha and beta types) and more information on disease treatment. Pdietry (talk) 03:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]