Talk:Thrilling Cities

Thrilling Cities has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 25, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

James Bond (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject James Bond, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.James BondWikipedia:WikiProject James BondTemplate:WikiProject James BondJames Bond articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Thrilling Cities/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 13:22, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, Mr Fleming, we are brought together again through the fiendish designs of your agent, Mr Schrocat... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:22, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I knew you wouldn't be able to resist falling into my fiendish trap! Let me explain my plan for Wiki-domination.... - SchroCat (^ • @) 13:50, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Toolbox checks -- no dab links or EL issues. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review -- aside from my usual copyedit, pretty straightforward, this one; prose, structure, detail, referencing, and supporting materials all seem fine -- considered it passed, well done! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:49, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's fantastic news: thanks very much indeed Ian! - SchroCat (^ • @) 05:57, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]