Talk:Thrikkunnathu Seminary

India: Kerala Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Christianity: India Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Christianity in India (assessed as Low-importance).

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Oriental Orthodoxy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on the Oriental Orthodox Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Oriental OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyOriental Orthodoxy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

google video

Google videos are not reliable sources. I have removed text and links to Google video from this talk page following WP:BLP. Gwen Gale (talk) 11:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Editors of this article must please read the following. As per Wikipedia rule every article must follow a Neutral Point of View. We the editors should not be trying to impose our own point of views in this article as it in a encyclopedia. The views of both churches should be put up here just like in the Catholicos of the East article. Please share your views. --ܠܝܓܘ Liju ലിജു לג"ו (talk) 15:29, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am once again requesting the editors of this article to discuss the different opinions of the different editors here. Please don't revert this comment.

--ܠܝܓܘ Liju ലിജു לג"ו (talk) 07:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at it this way: Editor opinions on this topic are more or less worthless. Only reliable sources will do. Gwen Gale (talk) 11:45, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

protected and stubified

I have stubified and protected this article owing to overwhelming BLP worries, an utter lack of sources, unencyclopedic bent, unclear writing and edit warring. All content in this article must be cited to a reliable source, abide by WP:BLP and be neutral in outlook. Gwen Gale (talk) 11:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

unprotected

User:Lijujacobk has noted the following sources:

I have unprotected the article but please heed, any text must be wholly neutral and carefully follow the sources (those above or any others which show up), with inline citations. Moreover, if names of living persons are put in the text, great care must be taken to abide by en.Wikipedia's biography of living persons policy. Also please mind, YouTube, other user-uploaded videos and blogs are not reliable sources and cannot be put into the article or even posted here on the talk page. Edit warring is not allowed and I may block any user who does so. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing other editors' comments

I've mentioned this to various people involved on their talk pages. On looking at the revision history of this talk page, I see that I need to repeat my words more strongly.

Do not remove other people's comments from talk pages unless you are an administrator.

An admin should now go through the history here and restore all the removed material in an appropriate way.—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 12:56, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Echoing S Marshall:

Do not remove other editors' comments from this talk page.
Add your own comments only at the bottom of posts which have come before, do not mix your comments into the comments of others.
Sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). Unsigned posts may be removed on sight.
Do not refactor (re-arrange or re-organize) posts on this page in any way.
Posts which violate the BLP policy will be removed. Editors who repeatedly violate the BLP or talk page policies will be blocked from editing. Gwen Gale (talk) 13:40, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

content

Going by the reliable sources now cited in the article, both the seminary and church have been closed for over 30 years. I've rewritten the text following the two cited sources. Any unsourced content will be removed. This article is not an Internet outlet for the PoV, advertising or claims of any group. Gwen Gale (talk) 12:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thoroughly sourced and written up from scratch. Gwen Gale (talk) 18:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

protected

I've protected this article from editing owing to blatant unsourced PoV flogging and likely BLP violations. Editors who cite sources here may gather consensus on this talk page for further edits to the article. Gwen Gale (talk) 15:05, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]