This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Three Percenters article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
I guess my question here is whether it's as relevant as the article makes it sound. This is largely based on documents obtained by hacking (so illegally obtained and unverified) and info from the same person who got the documents. The "instructions" are clear to observe, document and report, none of which are illegal. But possibly the bigger question for me is the relevance of the "organization". There is no national org and longer and it's a bunch of small, independent groups with no real coordination or reach. Lest someone accuse me of sympathizing, I'll state this clearly: I do not support unlawful interference in the election process. I think that dudes who run around on public streets kitted out like they're heading into Mosul are knuckleheads. And I believe that Joe Biden is the president. So maybe let's skip the angst over my userbox that says I'm a conservative. In the end, this would be like finding an email between 3 suspected Klan members in GA and trying to attribute their plan to a national effort that would require the coordination of numerous small, local orgs. I'd want more evidence of coordination before I saw it as relevant to the broader topic. And I'm not saying I oppose inclusion, I am rasing a question. Niteshift36 (talk) 12:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
