Talk:Three-child policy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Three-child policy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

China Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What's the point?

Why can't they just get rid of it and admit the one child policy was a mistake to begin with? They're going to have a shrinking population problem with or without this policy. --Saledomo (talk) 13:36, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page is about improving the article itself and not about the subject it describes. NM 23:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 201 - Thu

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Riven3388 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Riven3388 (talk) 13:38, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

The article needs clarification. Firstly, its speaks of the law in the past tense, but does not mention the national government repealing it. As to further confusion, it's mentioned that the policy was adopted by the State Council and later amended by the Standing Committee of the NPC, but then later mentions authorities in Sichuan Province simply scrapping it. How is this possible? Please provide explanations in the article. Criticalthinker (talk) 09:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To your first comment, I clarified in the lede by adding what the amendment of law did: allowing three children per couple. For your second comment, Sichuan did issue its rule allowing unlimited registrations. I added a citation. It is unclear from these reports what authority the Sichuan provincial government has to go beyond what the national law promulgates. Thank you. Path2space (talk) 21:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]