Jump to content

Talk:Threat Level Midnight/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 00:55, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • I know that the film isn't shown in its entirety, but maybe you should add in another graph to plot noting some of the highlights of the movie. "Throughout the episode, portions of the movie are seen, including...X"
    How's it look now?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • On the same token, I don't necessarily see the value of listing the credits in the plot section, because the list of guest actors and the roles they play really belong more in a dedicated section along the lines of "casting" in the Production section.
    Removed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • You should note Carrel's departure in the production section, as it makes a little smoother reading. It would explain why they produced an entire episode on a whim from him, and also a lot of the critical response which touches on it.
    Added.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are often pop culture references sections in Office articles. I think there were enough such references in the movie that they might be worth adding.
    Added.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Were there any deleted scenes included on the DVD release?
    They just included a longer version of the movie.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Darryl's opinion on portraying a black president before was elected Obama. " -- I think this needs to be reworded.
    Fixed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dab links tool returns no results. All external links appear to be working. I found only one duplicate link which I removed. I see no problems with article neutrality or stability. Images appear to be properly licensed.
Placing the article on hold pending fixes. —Ed!(talk) 01:11, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome! Thanks for the review. How does it look now?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great work! Passing GA now. —Ed!(talk) 10:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]