Talk:Thousand Talents Plan

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

I changed the article name from 'Thousand Talents Program' to 'Thousand Talents Plan'. The latter is in the official name, and is more widely used by authoritative sources. It was even (and remains) the main term in the lede of this article. Further discussion welcome, of course. - Onanoff (talk) 15:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thousand Talents arrests

This section is to allow people with further arrests tied to hiding affiliation with the programs. These should probably be added to the reaction section which already has one arrest of this type in it.

Professor Simon Ang of the University of Arkansas was recently arrested for hiding his affiliation with the program. Arrested, on May 8, complaint unsealed on May 11. https://www.thecollegefix.com/university-of-arkansas-professor-arrested-for-hiding-ties-to-china/ TMLutas (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article protection needed

~~Many IP editors are vandalizing it:~~

~~https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/956525262~~

~~Zezen (talk)~~ 05:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paraphrase

"They found that the scholars were high (but not top) caliber and outperformed overseas peers in last-authored publications because of greater access to larger research teams and better research funding in China" + "We find that YTT scientists are generally of high caliber in research but, as a group, fall below the top category in pre-return productivity"

My edit is reverted, and I want to know why? Why is the point of "outperformed overseas peers" not even mentioned at all? "Fall below the top category in pre-return productivity" means that compared to the top-tier caliber group in the former countries before returning to China, they were below that but still of high caliber regardless. 2600:6C44:117F:95BE:B133:AB97:8A85:A711 (talk) 23:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is published in Science, a highly well-respected journal! 2600:6C44:117F:95BE:B133:AB97:8A85:A711 (talk) 23:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]