Talk:Thou Art the Man

A fact from Thou Art the Man appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in "Thou Art the Man", one of Edgar Allan Poe's (pictured) lesser-known detective stories, ventriloquism is used to expose a murderer?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/October.

Wikipedia

Novels: Short story / Crime / 19th century Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Short story task force.
	This article is supported by Crime task force.
	This article is supported by 19th century task force.

New article

We should try to get this up to Did You Know? quality so it can be featured on the main page! We only have a few days, so hopefully we can add sources, etc. asap! --Midnightdreary 16:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section

The lead section keeps getting tagged with requests for citations, clarification, etc. I'm trying to follow guidelines in WP:LEAD as best I can. But, also, as a general practice, most intros are not bogged down with citations. According to WP:LEAD#Citations in the lead section, citations are only needed for contentious or possibly contested info. I don't really see anything particularly scandal-arousing or controversial about the lead in "Thou Art the Man." Could someone help me out here? --Midnightdreary 13:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect the problem is with the "perhaps", which does smack a bit of weasel wording. I'd either change it to a more certain statement, or link the citation used farther down the page at the end of the sentence. GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 14:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]