Talk:Thored

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thored article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Low‑importance

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Thored is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Thored has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 21, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 4, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Thored, ealdorman of southern Northumbria, disappears from the historical records after being charged with leading a fleet against marauding Vikings?

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Thored/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Starting GA review Jezhotwells (talk) 18:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick fail criteria assessment

The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

Pass quickfail criteria Jezhotwells (talk) 19:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):
This article is not reasonably well written. There are many errors of grammar throughout. I recommend that you enlist a copy editor at WP:Peer_review/volunteers#General_copyediting. I shall place the article on hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:07, 18 May 2009 (UTC) I have performed more copy editing and the article is now reasonably well written. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
b (MoS):
OK
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):
checked as far as is possible. ~~The ISBN checksums do not check. Please address this. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)~~ OK now Jezhotwells (talk) 23:22, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
b (citations to reliable sources):
OK
c (OR):
No evidence of OR
It is broad in its scope.
a (major aspects):
Broad in scope
b (focused):
Focussed
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
Stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
Images OK, but there is no description on the image page for the coins. I have templated the uploader Jezhotwells (talk) 20:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
~~Please enlist help to copy edit as cited above Jezhotwells (talk) 19:07, 18 May 2009 (UTC)~~ ~~Just the ISBNs of the books need checking and amending. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)~~ Ok, all good now, congratulations, passed as GA Jezhotwells (talk) 23:22, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've given this article a copy-edit. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 20:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]