Talk:Thomas Pownall/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 16:44, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I'll review this article for GA status, and should have a full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 16:44, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   • I'm seeing a combination of British and American English - both traveled and travelled, for example, and honor and honour.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   • In the infobox of File:Thomas Pownall.jpg, it says the licensing is based on author life + 70. However, the tag is based on pre-1923 publication. I think the infobox is correct, but either way, it needs to be fixed so they both say the same thing.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I am passing this article GA nomination. I found two minor niggles on prose and images, but neither are significant enough to hold up the nomination. Very nice work, Dana boomer (talk) 18:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I took care of the little things. Thanks for the review! Magic♪piano 01:47, 21 January 2013 (UTC)