Talk:Thomas Pakenham (historian)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Thomas Pakenham (historian) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Baron Pakenham?
[edit]Is he not also the 2nd Baron Pakenham? --Jfruh (talk) 02:49, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes but we generally don't mention additional titles inherited by the subject unless they were picked up separately. Pakenham is also the 8th (?) Baron Longford and 7th (?) Baron Silchester (although Baron Silchester is used as the courtesy title for the heir apparent, though Pakenham never used this either). Timrollpickering 16:35, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Livingstone vrs. Leopold?
[edit]I don't quite agree with the interpretation that the Scramble of Africa has as its main subject the differences in postures between Livingstone and Leopold. Livingstone is a minor character in the book and, although Leopold is a major character, so is Gladstone, Chamberlain, Hanotaux. The books deals with the different approaches, between England, France, Belgium, Germany and (in a minor role) Italy in the colonization process of Africa, how the own nature of these societies have influenced their postures toward the continent. That's pretty much it. --Mbm233 (talk) 13:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Photo
[edit]The photo looks very like that of his father. Is this an error or a family likeness? TomonaD (talk) 03:09, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
The photograph is definately of his father and needs to be removed or replaced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.70.221.66 (talk) 11:09, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Done. -- llywrch (talk) 21:09, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- All it takes to make this a "C" class is a photo! Sarah777 (talk) 20:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Identifying women by reference to their husbands
[edit]Does Wikipedia have a policy on this? I made a small change to the description of his sister Antonia Fraser, to emphasize her achievements rather than her marriage to Pinter. She's not just "a writer," she's a highly accomplished writer, and famous in her own right. She definitely should not be identified primarily by her husband. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.73.12.225 (talk) 12:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
the Scramble for Africa
[edit]in paragraphs only (essay form), discuss the political, economic, and social history and its peoples on the Scramble for Africa? 41.123.113.249 (talk) 11:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (peerage) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (peerage) articles
- Peerage and Baronetage work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class University of Oxford articles
- Unknown-importance University of Oxford articles
- Start-Class University of Oxford (colleges) articles
- Automatically assessed University of Oxford articles
- WikiProject University of Oxford articles
- Start-Class Ireland articles
- Low-importance Ireland articles
- Start-Class Ireland articles of Low-importance
- All WikiProject Ireland pages
- Wikipedia requested images of peers
- Wikipedia requested images of people of Ireland