Jump to content

Talk:Thomas McCosker v The State

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment 1

[edit]

Well done to AYArktos for the work in improving the article. Capitalistroadster 12:00, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As the person who started this article, I can only say how impressed I am at the current article. Thanks for saving the article! Andjam 00:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Standard of original trial

[edit]

According to "Little help, no protest for Victorian jailed in Fiji", the original trial and sentence done within 48 hours, and he had no legal representation. Should this be noted in the article? Andjam 00:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think it might be useful to note. The Fijian Human Rights people were not impressed at the charges. I think those charges had not been used for many years either. There is of course expansion possible as to how the matter came to light - report of theft, ... However, I think the article would do better to focus on the issues and not the narrative of these particular circumstances. My two cents only.--A Y Arktos\talk 01:27, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

page move?

[edit]

Shouldn't this be moved to "McCoskar v. The State" or something like that? It's less about the man than it is about the case. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 23:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Thomas McCosker v The State. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]