Jump to content

Talk:Thomas Lukaszuk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Whitewashed

[edit]

The page has been repeatedly whitewashed, with confirmed statements being deleted. Undos of informational data have been reverted, and an NPOV tag has been added. Wikigratia (talk) 16:54, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Thomas Lukaszuk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:05, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy focus

[edit]

I've been wondering how to improve this article, and I wonder if some of the controversy section can be removed. In particular, the bit about him being a total asshole without any context doesn't seem to add anything to the article or the section, and isn't really a controversy about him. Other than that, it would read better if sectioned off properly, rather than having massive amounts of content dumped into the same sections. I'll work on that to start... Ajraddatz (talk) 01:35, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed that particular sentence (diff). If anyone has issues with the removal, feel free to revert me and discuss here. Though, it looks as if not many people watch this article... Ajraddatz (talk) 02:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Thomas Lukaszuk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]