Talk:Thomas Lound

Thomas Lound has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 3, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Thomas Lound/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"painter John Thirtle. He was popular" Lound or Thirtle?
"watercolourists" can we link?
"landscapist David Cox. His etchings" whose? Cox or Lound?
British Newspaper Archive links should be marked as via=British Newspaper Archive.
"the Artists' Conversaziones in the" what was that?
"his life. died" something awry here.
", whose influence" maybe "although his" in the context of this sentence?
"He became an accomplished" Lound became..
"prolific watercolourist" link that here too as well as in the lead.
"working life.[22][14] He" ref order.
"c.1832" space between c. and year.
"c.1850" ditto.
"Lound (1802-1861)." en-dash for year range.
"1802-1861: etchings" likewise.
Eight external links? Is there anything in those which could be added in via inline referencing?
Is there a good subcat of Category:Watercolorists which could be usefully added?

That's it, nice article. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:25, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: All the above comments have been addressed and hopefully sorted, but it's worth pointing out that Wikipedia:Nominating_good_articles#External_links says WP:EL isn't within the GA criteria. I've removed those external links that added little to the article. Amitchell125 (talk) 11:38, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, there's a whole lot not in the GA criteria, a lot of what I do is to give good advice which often extends beyond GA criteria, but I don't enforce it. Thanks for taking it into consideration. Good to go. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 11:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]