This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
An image is requested for this article as its inclusion will substantially increase the significance of the article. Please remove the image-needed parameter once the image is added.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
I am soliciting feedback on Talk:Thomas Keightley (historian) regarding my proposed Move to rename Thomas Keightley (historian) as Thomas Keightley. Thomas Keightley (historian) actually refers to the author of Fairy Mythology and other titles, though he had written historical outlines and texts in the past as well.
I feel the renaming warranted since the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC are easily met, that is to say, according to search engines, most of the scholarly interest and activity on "Thomas Keightley" keyword gravitate on the historian/folklorist overwhelmingly, compared to the politician/official of the same name.
If you disagree, and can argue that the Thomas Keightley (official) has equal enduring interest, please provide counter-argument at the Talk page indicated. Please give some semblance of an argument (either by conducting your own search engine probe, or basing on prior knowledge), but please do not just give your gut vote, as per WP:VOTE. --Kiyoweap (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]