Jump to content

Talk:Tom Homan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Thomas Homan)

New York Times reference to firing of Sally Yates

[edit]

The inclusion of the New York Times article, at present note no 8, on the firing of acting Attorney General Sally Yates, and the mysterious incorporation into the note of a quotation from it referring to Nixon's Saturday Night Massacre should likely be removed, as it seems not to refer at all to Homans, and the quotation is irrelevant to this Wikipedia entry. Actio (talk) 16:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neither can I see any reason not to just delete the NYT 1/30/2017 Lichtblau, et al. reference. It isn't pertinent and adds nothing to the paragraph to which it's attached. Rt3368 (talk) 16:56, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading interpretation of cited article

[edit]

In the final article of this page, we find the following assertion:

> He stated that despite committing a crime by entering the country illegally, illegal immigrants do not commit more crimes than the rest of the population in the U.S.

However, in the Business Insider article that is cited for this assertion, we find this:

> "Did I say aliens commit more crimes than US citizens? I didn't say that," Homan told reporters at an off-camera briefing. "I'm saying, number one, they're in the country illegally. They already committed one crime by entering the country illegally. But when they commit a crime against a citizen of this country, they draw our attention."

This is intentionally misleading. He did not make any such statement and the current wording of this Wikipedia article suggests an entirely different meaning. I hate to say it, but this sounds like politically-charged vandalism. I have added a Failed verification tag to this sentence.

64.124.125.2 (talk) 19:47, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Leftists actively trying to rewrite history 2601:18C:8203:D960:3149:5918:DDB4:BAD1 (talk) 03:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In depth interviews on CNN with Wolf Blitzer

[edit]

June 19 2018 Wikipietime (talk) 21:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

what does "Fixed flash information" mean?

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thomas_Homan&diff=prev&oldid=1238072034

Within the Trump administration, he was among the most strident proponents of separating children from their parents as a means of deterring illegal entry into the country

is adequately sourced and should be restored

the reference to "Mr. Homan" is a bit telling

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thomas_Homan&diff=prev&oldid=1238064690 soibangla (talk) 01:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if the IP editor or others do not respond with a reasonable explanation within 48 hours, I will interpret the removal as a politically motivated drive-by and restore it, as the subject is a potential candidate for a very controversial government position soibangla (talk) 06:41, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Motivation for family separations

[edit]

The opening paragraph states that the policy of family separations is motivated by a desire to prevent human trafficking in addition to the obvious motivation of deterring certain types of immigration. This reads as speculative and unnecessary addition. After checking, I can see that the article cited explicitly contradicts the claim:

"A damage-control working group developed fact sheets suggesting, without evidence, that most of the separated children were trafficking victims, according to two people who were present."

The motivation of deterrence from immigration is clear. The motivation to prevent human trafficking is contradicted by the article cited and reads as speculation. Removed. Optimister (talk) 17:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The use of the word "proponent" seems really out of place. I don't recall anything I've seen, heard, or read where Homan actually suggests separating families could, should, or would be used as a tool. If anything, doing so would be a side-effect that should be viewed as a possibility - just as a father going to prison would separate him from his family...which is a statement of fact. 2601:703:4101:69D0:3CEF:FC4:B8A6:577E (talk) 07:32, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use of the term "czar"

[edit]

While the term "czar" is qualified with a point of information, it strikes me that designating any individual as a "Czar" in the info capsule is seriously misleading to an average viewer. At the very least the term czar should be in quotes "czar" to indicate that the term is used informally and does not have any official standing. 76.174.40.248 (talk) 22:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm not sure that it's really an official title he holds and it easily could confuse someone as to what his position actually is Qqars (talk) 15:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's a Border Czar? Is he not Director of Homeland Security?

[edit]

What's a Border Czar? Is he not Director of Homeland Security? Alexysun (talk) 04:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Border Czar is an informal title for people tasked with managing the border but don't have an official government position Qqars (talk) 15:10, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noem was nominated for that position. Most likely, like "D.O.G.E." a "czar" position may very well be created. 2601:703:4101:69D0:3CEF:FC4:B8A6:577E (talk) 07:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Life?

[edit]

According to this article, he's married to a woman named Elizabeth and has four children:

https://www.caclubindia.com/money/news/tom-homan/

Webbess10 (talk) 06:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Puerto Rico necesito serious

[edit]

Puerto Rico the government provide the benefit Federal to the people Dominic Republic in legal need to check the office of immigration and Puerto Rico more than 40 years is the working the government hospitality in legal have the houses in legal Puerto Rico need serious deep immigration thank you 131.106.239.65 (talk) 12:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elimination of Border Czar

[edit]

I have eliminated the border czar position. This term is a shorthand for the director of ICE.

As a corroborating source, an AP article including an interview with Homan regarding his work with the upcoming administration refers extensively to Homan’s plans running ICE. Specifically regarding planned deportations and the like. Homan indicates that these raids would be carried out by ICE. Homan has not spoke about coordinating border activity with any other agency so the evidence is there that this will be a second term as ICE director.

The article in question: https://apnews.com/article/trump-homan-ice-border-czar-7dea915b5ea43896390b8020d254f887

I wouldn’t mind putting it back under Director of ICE with the link to “executive branch officials referred to as czar” but wanted to check consensus. I am a Leaf (talk) 06:19, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]