Talk:Thomas Erastus

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Thomas Erastus is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reformed Christianity

	Reformed Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reformed Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Reformed Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Reformed ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityReformed Christianity articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Switzerland C‑class Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Erastianism

There really ought to be a separate article on Erastianism. john k 07:45, 23 July 2007 (UTC) A separate Erastianism article would be useful. In his impact on the theory of church discipline from the sixteenth century into the mid seventeenth century, he would seem to fall in the mid to high priority categories. (More closely fitting the high definition.) Gamonetus (talk) 02:13, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i second the need to create a separate article on the Erastianism an its legacy (and can help initiate such once I have some free time, unless others would like to start). It would have to begin (in my estimation) by acknowledging that the common use of the the term erastianism, beginning in the 17th century, slipped somewhat from Erastus original thought away from an exclusive focus on church discipline, and took on a life of its own. Nonetheless, this article would discuss the 'varieties of erastianism' in 17th and 18th century thought and practice. It might include sections on Grotius, Hobbes, Harrington, Puffendorf, Thomasius etc; and on leading controversies over erastianism (in the 17th century Dutch Republlic, for example, and erastian parties in England during the Commonwealth and after the Restoration). Erastianism, understood broadly as the supremacy of civil authority in ecclesiastical affairs, and at the expense of clerical autonomy, was critical in in the early modern evolution of state-craft, definitions of sovereignty and figured centrally in arguments over toleration, etc.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 04:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs Editing

The expository information about Erastus seems to be copied directly from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library without any form of citation, not to mention being somewhat misleading and strangely phrased. My Immoral (talk) 05:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]