Talk:Thomas Dine
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
There's another entry for the same person under 'Tom Dine'
[edit]How do we resolve this? The other one is more developed, but not very much so. My pref would be to use the name the person in question favors, but is there another decision rule people prefer? Supercarpenter (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'm seeing 'Thomas' on this list: [1]. 'Tom' here: [2] Supercarpenter (talk) 17:34, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- This important NYT article has 'Thomas': [3] I say we should go with Thomas as more correct in the context of an encyclopedia. Can someone tell me how to merge the two entries? Supercarpenter (talk) 17:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Now the other one seems much more developed so I will blank this one and redirect. I do not know if the other one is fully accurate but it appears that Dine is no longer CEO of the San Francisco Federation. As for retitling the other one, I leave that to others. But I will add his full name. Gentlemath (talk) 22:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)