Talk:Thomas Barclay (economic writer)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

Not sure the nominations are that notable, but there seemed to be little on the guy except for briefly being an MP.--T. Anthony (talk) 14:28, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on this guy seems to have actually been important to the Entente cordiale. (~~Unless a different Barclay is meant~~ It's not, see his book) I just assumed the article being so cruddy, and linking to so little, meant his getting nominated for the Peace Prize so much was a fluke. Silly me, I should've remembered Wikipedia is poor in many important areas. Hopefully someone can expand this. Sir Thomas Barclay results at Google Scholar and Sir Thomas Barclay at Google Books.--T. Anthony (talk) 14:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very well

I'll expand it myself then, but later. I'm having some sinus problems right now and I have things to do in life. I might wait until next year even, but if I'm the only one interested in the idea of expansion than I'll have to be the one to do it.--T. Anthony (talk) 00:03, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]