Talk:Thomas Andrews

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Northern Ireland Mid‑importance

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Belfast Mid‑importance

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belfast, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the City of Belfast, Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.BelfastWikipedia:WikiProject BelfastTemplate:WikiProject BelfastBelfast-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Irish Maritime

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish Maritime, a collaborative effort to improve and standardise the content and structure of maritime, seafaring and inland waterways articles associated with the island of Ireland. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Irish MaritimeWikipedia:WikiProject Irish MaritimeTemplate:WikiProject Irish MaritimeIrish Maritime articles

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Untitled

Was Andrews a Protestant or a Catholic? The article doesn't say. Dolmance (talk) 20:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This has been rewritten, but the rewrite has removed Thomas Andrews as being the chief designer which is contrary to the books other sources I have on the subject which state him as having been the chief designer. Ben W Bell 9 July 2005 07:47 (UTC)

I hopefully clarified Andrew's involvement MechBrowman July 9, 2005 15:28 (UTC)

The rewrite is correct. The main designers of the Olympic class ships were Lord William Pirrie, Alexander Carlisle, Thomas Andrews and Edward Wilding, in that order. The role of Andrews was much exaggerated by his many admirers after his death. Dave Gittins.

"Right Honourable"

Although the article is not about the father, it would be a good detail to amend the mention of Andrews' father so as to indicate how he came by the "Right Honourable" title ... was he a politician, a baron, what? Lawikitejana 19:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to this page, he was a member of the Privy Council of Ireland; privy counsellors were entitled to the style (not title) of "Right Honourable". --Charlene 09:55, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know Ireland's green, but...

Does anyone have access to a photograph of Andrews that isn't quite as green as the one we have? Every time I check this page for subtle vandalism I feel like I'm checking on the Grinch who Stole Christmas. I have a photograph in an old Titanic book but I don't have a proper scanner. --Charlene 07:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

number of the dead?

it says 1496 in this article, but in other passengers articles it says 1517.

1496 is correct according to modern research by Lester Mitcham and others. Figures from the two inquiries and from contemporary newspapers are incorrect.

Dave Gittins

Fair use rationale for Image:Titanic Andrews.jpg

Image:Titanic Andrews.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

William Barnes

Is it okay to mention at least on the talk page, that William Barnes believes he was Thomas Andrew in his past life and wrote a book on the Secrets of Building the Titanic? --173.170.134.224 (talk) 20:50, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Who? Canterbury Tail talk 00:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Three sentence summary of one random film portrayal

The article lists 14 portrayals of Andres in films about the Titanic. Excessive? Probably. We do not have a list of random appearances of Richard Nixon in film.

More to the point, an IP editor has repeatedly restored a three sentence summary of Andrews' appearance in one of the films. Why that one? I guess the editor has seen that one. What does it tell us about Andrews? Nothing.

Any reason we should have this brief summary of the scene in one of the 14 films, selected at random? - SummerPhD^v2.0 16:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Due to persistent edit warring and block evasion by the IP, the article is now protected. Any user who is not currently blocked is welcome to comment. - SummerPhD^v2.0 03:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Belfast, Ireland"

Is there a reason why it says "Belfast, Ireland" instead of "Belfast, Northern Ireland" in the lead section?

Yes. Because it was Belfast, Ireland during Andrew's lifetime. Northern Ireland didn't exists until 9 years after his death. Canterbury Tail talk 12:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 July 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved as clear consensus has been established. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Music1201 ^talk 02:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– Thomas Andrews (shipbuilder) is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. He gets the most page views, with 1,363 a day according to the tool - others do not have much over 10. As the man who designed the Titanic, he has high educational significance. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:27, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 14:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Really, there's nothing else to say. Dschslava^Δxparlez moi 04:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clear primary topic in terms of page views and historical significance. PC78 (talk) 16:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Andrews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605053725/http://www.ulsterhistory.co.uk/thomasandrews.htm to http://www.ulsterhistory.co.uk/thomasandrews.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:08, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andrews and the painting

In Bullock's book, he mentioned that Andrews was standing in a state of shock in the first class smoking room, but didn't mention the painting and wrote "what did he see" and "whatever he saw". Walter Lord mentioned the painting in his book, and that probably derived into later movies. It seems that the 'extra' detail about the painting was just an imaginative addition to Stewart's account that was tacked onto it by Lord who felt a need to 'pin down' the exact cause of Andrew's "stood like one stunned". 2.97.27.181 (talk) 20:57, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Contents 3.1 Death. Sentence "Although this has become one of the most famous individuals of the Titanic disaster" does not make sense re: "individuals", since the sentence is not referring to Andrews himself but rather to the circumstances surrounding his death. Previous version ("Although this has become one of the most famous legends of the sinking of the Titanic") makes grammatical sense. Could also use "stories" or "tales" as replacement for "individuals". 2A00:23C7:99AE:6300:F004:8296:314D:13DF (talk) 18:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. ◢ Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 00:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 July 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Lists birthplace as Ireland. This is inaccurate and should say United Kingdom. 77.98.158.25 (talk) 18:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. It is correct, as Ireland was a constituent country of the United Kingdom, like Wales, Scotland and England. Canterbury Tail talk 18:43, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dispelling the # of lifeboats myth

There is currently no reliable source that Thomas Andrews requested a greater number of lifeboats while designing the Titanic, so I am seeking to remove this claim from the article. We currently cite the Titanic fanpage of a self-described amateur historian which is an unreliable source for obvious reasons. While pop media sites frequently regurgitate this apocryphal claim, I can find no backing in published histories or peer-reviewed sources. One reliable source I have found names Alexander Carlisle as requesting more lifeboats and does not mention Andrews at all in this matter [see John P. Eaton, Titanic: Triumph and Tragedy (1995), pp. 205 & 259]. TelepathicTwelve (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:UGC I have gone ahead and removed the fansite's claims. I welcome someone to find a reliable source on this question. TelepathicTwelve (talk) 17:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]