Talk:Thomas Aikenhead

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 8, 2014, January 8, 2018, January 8, 2020, January 8, 2021, and January 8, 2024.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Re: Thomas Macaulay

The article states that "Thomas Macaulay mistold" the story of Aikenhead. In what way was it mistold? What is the source for that judgment, ie, against what standard is Macaulay being judged as inaccurate?Moioci (talk) 16:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC) Update: I see that that text came directly from the page at uua.org. My questions still stand.Moioci (talk) 16:09, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems to have been cut and pasted from the unitarian website linked to at the bottom of page. Unfortunately I know nothing at all about this case so I can't attempt to remedy the situation myself. Jamrifis (talk) 12:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Having written the original version and some subsequent changes I'll just say it was without any reference to any such Unitarian website page. AllyD (talk) 17:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then I would suggest the Unitarian page has lifted your page from wikipedia, as the bottom two paragraphs are a word for word copy: http://www25.uua.org/uuhs/duub/articles/thomasaikenhead.html

Sorry for any implied insult, it's just these acts of plagiarism usually flow in the other direction. Jamrifis (talk) 21:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Age

If Aikenhead was born in March 1676 and was executed on 8 January 1697, how can he of been 20 years of age at his death? Brough87 (talk) 12:25, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

His 20th birthday was March 1696. His 21st birthday would have been in March 1697. Therefore, when he was executed in January 1697, he was still 20 years old. RoastDack (talk) 20:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But these dates are (presumably) under the old Julian calendar which was not only several days behind the modern Gregorian calendar introduced in 1752, but also began the year on 25th March. So the correct answer might take a bit of working out. Cassandra. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.74.45.3 (talk) 13:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Biography/early life

Aside from a guess at the month of this birth, this theoretically biographical article says nothing at all about its subject occurring before the act for which he lost his life (in fact, it begins with the indictment). Who were his parents? What influences might have led him to think and act the way he did? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 22:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea but that magick claim is pretty ridiculous. Bozo33 (talk) 19:52, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]