Talk:This Immortal

Novels: Sci-fi Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Is the dust jacket quote from Lord of Light really related enough to be included? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.67.252.128 (talk) 00:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I don't think its really relevant enough--I'm going to go ahead and take it out and add a few more bits to make up for the loss. --72.150.89.179 16:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This Immortal

I just removed the following from the article, as we don't discuss Wikipedia articles in Wikipedia articles. Lest it return, here is the text:

Previous versions of the page have incorrectly referred to ...And Call Me Conrad as being a novella that was expanded to the novel This Immortal.

RossPatterson (talk) 04:29, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of ISBN from Wikidata

Please note that this article's infobox is retrieving an ISBN from Wikidata currently. This is the result of a change made to {{Infobox book}} as a result of this RfC. It would be appreciated if an editor took some time to review this ISBN to ensure it is appropriate for the infobox. If it is not, you could consider either correcting the ISBN on Wikidata (preferred) or introducing a blank ISBN parameter in the infobox to block the retrieval from Wikidata. If you do review the ISBN, please respond here so other editors don't duplicate your work. This is an automated message to address concerns that this change did not show up on watchlists. ~ Rob^Talk 01:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]