Talk:Thirsty Merc/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

My main concerns are:

verifiability (mainly in the first few paragraphs of the History section, this qualifies as original research unless a reference can be found)
neutrality ("received heavy airplay in Australia on an impressive number of songs")
not broad enough - I'd expect an encyclopaedic entry on this band to be less focussed on chart performance and have at least one paragraph on musical/songwriting style, influence and musicians that influenced them, etc
images would really be preferable

These are mostly violations of WP:GACR, so a cleanup is necessary in order to retain GA status. Heptachord (talk) 02:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've tackled these main concerns and believe that I have addressed them to the required standard. The only one I'm not especially happy about are the added images: they're either blurry or with band members obscured by equipment or each other, but hopefully they are better than nothing and shouldn't prevent retention of GA.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 11:31, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Its almost a month since I tackled this article, no new concerns have been raised and no decision has been announced. Could Heptacord please provide a decision or raise further concerns if not yet satisfied?shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 08:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Closing review due to abandonment by reviewer. -- Khazar2 (talk) 20:50, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]