Jump to content

Talk:Thirsty Beaver/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 13:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a go at this one. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • Ah, what a sad story. I do think the link to "holdout" in the lead should display that word, however. (Could be "[[holdout|held out]] against two offers".)
Completed this Bruxton (talk) 15:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • No need for "Holdout" in the See also list, by the way, as it's already in use, though you might want to link it once in the article body.
Completed this Bruxton (talk) 15:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not sure the 'Background' / 'History' split really works, as both sections describe the building's history. Most of the material would work in a 'History' section, with the last paragraphs ("The bar ... month.", and "In 2021, ... there.") of each of the two current sections in a 'Features' section.
I have rearranged the article Bruxton (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can't see the bras nailed to the entrances, presumably they're inside. Quite the feature.
Yes to get images I had to ask Flickr editors to change the license on their uploads - none of the interior yet.
  • The images run into the References, since the infobox takes up so much space. Might be as well to organize them in a gallery.
I have created a gallery
I changed the caption to read "mage of the beaver mural"
  • Spotchecks are fine. I've marked [7] Sprinkle's link as dead, no worries as it's already archived.
Green tickY Bruxton (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

[edit]

Well, that's about it from me. All good, basically. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.