Talk:ThincLab
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Added additional secondary/third party sources
[edit]I've added additional secondary sources to the article, as I ran out of time when publishing the page (had plans to revisit & improve the article.)
Hopefully these will suffice for now. If you are happy with the levels of citations, we can remove the This article has multiple issues notice.
Renaissance domenic (talk) 10:09, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Renaissance domenic and thanks for the note. Yes, that's looking better, but I've run out of time and energy for the night so will revisit tomorrow to see if it needs anything else. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Okay I've given it a bit of a once-over, added a couple of details about locations, fixed a couple of minor errors, and removed the templates, although it is still a bit light on independent sources in third-party media. Also removed the "list is incomplete" template as most of these kinds of lists are incomplete, and it is implied by saying "includes" that it is incomplete. Hope this helps. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:52, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Stub-Class South Australia articles
- Low-importance South Australia articles
- WikiProject South Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles