Talk:They Saved Lisa's Brain

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the They Saved Lisa's Brain article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

They Saved Lisa's Brain has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

They Saved Lisa's Brain is part of the The Simpsons (season 10) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 21, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
October 25, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

The Simpsons Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Simpsons, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to The Simpsons on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The SimpsonsWikipedia:WikiProject The SimpsonsTemplate:WikiProject The SimpsonsThe Simpsons articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

edit

Collaboration: Featured topic Drive
Copyedit:
Merge:
Cleanup: Ralph Wiggum, Milhouse Van Houten
Shorten plot synopsis:
Free-use images: Jon Vitti, Pamela Hayden, Greg Daniels, Ian Maxtone-Graham, Jim Reardon, Alf Clausen
Reference: Bongo Comics Group, The Heartbroke Kid, World of Springfield
Expand: The Simpsons Theme, Bongo Comics, Mark Kirkland, Jim Reardon, The Simpsons: Tapped Out
Stubs: Neil Affleck, Bob Anderson (director), Wes Archer, J. Stewart Burns More...

Untitled

someone put the quote "i am smart, much smarter than you, hibert!" in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.145.191 (talk • contribs)

"Larry Flynt is right!" Possibly the funniest thing ever said in human history.

Fair use rationale for Image:Aabf18.jpg

Image:Aabf18.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:They Saved Lisa's Brain/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: NoD'ohnuts (talk) 19:11, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article in just a moment NoD'ohnuts (talk) 19:11, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

the IMDb link doesn't seem to be a reliable source. NoD'ohnuts (talk) 19:47, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed it since I couldn't find anything reliable. Queenieacoustic (talk) 20:28, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question as to wether theme and cultural references should be put together, as it seems that cultural references could be it's own section. NoD'ohnuts (talk) 19:47, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's only one paragraph so I don't think it needs its own section. I've used "Theme and cultural references" in articles before, namely in I'm With Cupid, Make Room for Lisa, Maximum Homerdrive and Thirty Minutes Over Tokyo, (all of which are GA) and they got no comment over that. Thanks for the suggestion though! Queenieacoustic (talk) 20:28, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, only two fixes and it's a pass, although I might have missed something, since this is my first review. I'll put the article on hold for the mean time NoD'ohnuts (talk) 19:47, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! Nice to see that someone who has promoted several Good Articles has also started reviewing! :) Queenieacoustic (talk) 20:28, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yah, I though I'd just help with all of those nominees NoD'ohnuts (talk) 02:44, 21 July 2011 (UTC)NoD'ohnuts[reply]

That's a pass NoD'ohnuts (talk) 02:44, 21 July 2011 (UTC)NoD'ohnuts[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on They Saved Lisa's Brain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on They Saved Lisa's Brain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011191230/http://currentfilm.com/dvdreviews9/simpsonss10dvd.html to http://www.currentfilm.com/dvdreviews9/simpsonss10dvd.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]