Talk:They Met in Argentina

A fact from They Met in Argentina appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 November 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that They Met in Argentina was described in one review as "an American musical at its worst"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/They Met in Argentina.

Wikipedia

Argentina

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve They Met in Argentina, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Reception box office info

The article says that the film lost $270K at the box office. This simply isn't possible. Box office is ticket sales, and to have any number less than zero requires an explanation. It's possible that the film lost $270K total, but there would have been ticket sales, a positive number, and the cost of producing and publicizing the movie, a negative number. Whatever the data was, if all you have is a loss number, then don't call it box office. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:38, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out - colloquially valid, but encyclopedically not. Changed just to "loss", which is what the source describes. Moswento ^talky 14:48, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]