Talk:Thermal low/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
concerns about two of the sources
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Specific concerns

What makes http://www.theweatherprediction.com/ a reliable source?
What makes http://library.thinkquest.org/C003603/english/monsoons/causesofmonsoons.shtml a reliable source? Thinkquest is a student written site.
If you were planning on going to FAC, you'll need a citation for the last four sentences of "Role in the monsoon..." section. It won't hold back GA status.

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.Ealdgyth - Talk 13:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've made the changes you requested. If not, let me know what still needs to be done. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:48, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Passing it now. Ealdgyth - Talk 20:45, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]