Talk:There's a Riot Goin' On/GA2
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- In the lead, it would be more encyclopedic if "#1" was changed to "number one".
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- In the lead, it would be more encyclopedic if "#1" was changed to "number one".
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Dates need to be unlinked, per here. In the lead, it would be best if "funk" was linked once, per here. The image in the Conception section should not be left-aligned directly below a level 2 header, per here. Same section, the link to "Everyday People" needs to be fixed. Same section, "Billboard" needs to be italicized, per here. In the Album artwork section, why is "1970s" linked? In the Initial section, italicize "Billboard".
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Dates need to be unlinked, per here. In the lead, it would be best if "funk" was linked once, per here. The image in the Conception section should not be left-aligned directly below a level 2 header, per here. Same section, the link to "Everyday People" needs to be fixed. Same section, "Billboard" needs to be italicized, per here. In the Album artwork section, why is "1970s" linked? In the Initial section, italicize "Billboard".
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Reference 7 is missing Publisher info.
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Reference 7 is missing Publisher info.
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- Does Reference 8 cover all this ---> "Following the massive acclaim of their previous LP, 1969's Stand!, and the new found fame it engendered, Sly & the Family Stone were due to have submitted an album of new recordings to Epic Records in 1970. However, creative head of the group and multi-instrumentalist Sly Stone missed several recording deadlines, worrying CBS executive Clive Davis. The band's Greatest Hits album had been released in the midst of an eighteen-month stretch from late 1969 to late 1971, during which the band released no new material. With the its newfound fame and success came other problems. Relationships within the band were deteriorating, as there was friction between the Stone brothers, Sly and Freddie, and bassist Larry Graham"? Are there any sources available for paragraph 3 in the Production section.
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Does Reference 8 cover all this ---> "Following the massive acclaim of their previous LP, 1969's Stand!, and the new found fame it engendered, Sly & the Family Stone were due to have submitted an album of new recordings to Epic Records in 1970. However, creative head of the group and multi-instrumentalist Sly Stone missed several recording deadlines, worrying CBS executive Clive Davis. The band's Greatest Hits album had been released in the midst of an eighteen-month stretch from late 1969 to late 1971, during which the band released no new material. With the its newfound fame and success came other problems. Relationships within the band were deteriorating, as there was friction between the Stone brothers, Sly and Freddie, and bassist Larry Graham"? Are there any sources available for paragraph 3 in the Production section.
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:30, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Got it fixed up. Dan56 (talk) 00:50, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you to Dan56 for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)