Talk:Theoretical psychology
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Trevor1902, Matthew.j.benjamin, Caitlyn.mcconnell, Fstromberg.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Ideas for Sections
[edit]I had some ideas for sections that could be added to this page. Basically, I'd like to introduce some common topics/themes discussed in theoretical and philosophical psychology. Does anyone else have any other ideas for this page? Urstadt (talk) 05:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
not much to hold
[edit]theres this section titled importance or relevance or significance basically dealing with the question "what is this good for?" this section reaches a conclusion at its end saying that it must be good for something after all: "Theoretical psychology can be extremely beneficial because it brings together scientific ideas and philosophical ideas of psychology. Integrating these ideas contributes to the knowledge of psychology." which after cutting through the unsubstantial big words boils down to "TP could be of some use after all because it brings stuff together. bringing stuff together contributes to stuff." i am really sorry to express such a concern but this sounds about as substantial as thin air. i dont know if the field of TP is such a hocus-pocus or it is just the article but this does not sound as a convincing argument about the usefulness of theoretical psychology. it is either some marginal field on the verge of being pseudoscience or the article makes it a poor service by promoting it like it was that.89.134.199.32 (talk) 21:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC).