Talk:Theopaschism

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Theopaschism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Christianity High‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

From the article "a split in the Church between those that accepted theopaschism (the Church) and those that didn't ("non-Chalcedonian", monophysite oriental orthodox churches)."

This looks POV - calling the Chalcedonians "the Church". But I wonder if it is correct - how could monophysites doubt it?--Henrygb 16:12, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly POV, but also incorrect. This is an issue with Nestorianism, not Monophysitism. Changing. Lxx 04:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Classical Augustinian theology?

The article in part reads: "Classicial Augustinian theology, on the contrary, maintains that the man Jesus suffered to a much greater extent, in order to avoid to charges of modalism and patripassionism."

Maintains that "the Man Jesus" suffered more than who? The Word? Aren't the Word and the Man Jesus supposed to be the same? This quote sounds Nestorian to me. Can we get a citation on this? Deusveritasest (talk) 03:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]