Talk:Theological censure
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Theological censure article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Heresy in the Catholic Church#Degrees was copied or moved into Theological censure#Different classifications with this edit on 10:58, 4 February 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Should this be mentioned?
[edit]Should the following papal quote be mentioned?
[I]t is not sufficient for learned Catholics to accept and revere the aforesaid dogmas of the Church, but that it is also necessary to subject themselves to the decisions pertaining to doctrine which are issued by the Pontifical Congregations, and also to those forms of doctrine which are held by the common and constant consent of Catholics as theological truths and conclusions, so certain that opinions opposed to these same forms of doctrine, although they cannot be called heretical, nevertheless deserve some theological censure.
Veverve (talk) 21:46, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Also, the Doctrinal Commentary on the Concluding Formula of the Professio fidei states : "A proposition contrary to these doctrines can be qualified as erroneous or, in the case of teachings of the prudential order, as rash or dangerous and therefore 'tuto doceri non potest'." Veverve (talk) 23:15, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class Catholicism articles
- Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- B-Class Christianity articles
- Unknown-importance Christianity articles
- B-Class Christian theology articles
- Unknown-importance Christian theology articles
- Christian theology work group articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles