Talk:Themes in Minority Report/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Wildroot (talk) 07:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of December 18, 2010, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Written in clear language, with good flow and article structure.
- 2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout to appropriate sources.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Yes, covers many aspects.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Article indeed appears written with a neutral tone.
- 5. Article stability? Talk page history and dialogue seems fine.
- 6. Images?: Only one image used - fair use rationale on image page.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to AaronY, who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. Wildroot (talk) 07:41, 18 December 2010 (UTC)