This article was nominated for deletion on June 11 2013. The result of the discussion was no consensus, defaulted to delete...without prejudice for recreating another article with the same name, but without copyright violations..
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Yes. It was originally created as a POV fork full of copyvio and unsourced nonsense, and deleted at the AFD I raised "without prejudice to recreation without copyvio". I've since defended it from turning into the same thing again, but one round with the knee-jerk types who couldn't take the time to actually analyse the situation and think deleting a pile of crap is the end of the world was enough for me, I'm afraid, sorry, I've done what I can. I'd just redirect it, but I'm sure someone would object again. Begoontalk15:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]