Talk:The Wrong Mans

BBC: Sitcoms Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by BBC Sitcoms Task Force.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British / Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Berkshire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Berkshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Berkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BerkshireWikipedia:WikiProject BerkshireTemplate:WikiProject BerkshireBerkshire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sources

Tentinator 08:42, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Series 2

Good catch. I've added the info to the article w/the DS ref, as it seems to be the original source for both articles. Thanks! Shoebox2 talk 02:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Too much detail?

A genuine question, because I'm new to the conventions of the TV articles: is the level of detail in the 'Reactions' section verging on unnecessary, or is it just me? Do we really need a lengthy quote from each critic who ever reviewed the show, or for that matter the specific ratings metrics of each individual episode? (I checked the article on Breaking Bad, just for reference, and found only a neat little single-paragraph summary of critical response by season.)

I'd like to condense the section to the basic ratings average I added earlier, plus a few representative quotes after maybe a sentence or two summarizing the general tone of the critical response. Am however seeking consensus prior to messing about so drastically with anyone else's hard work. :) Shoebox2 (talk) 21:24, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it! You have my *blessing* — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 21:27, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Have now made the attempt, feel free to edit as needed. :)Shoebox2 (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Wrong Mans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130318052904/http://www.barb.co.uk:80/viewing/weekly-top-30 to http://www.barb.co.uk/viewing/weekly-top-30

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]