Talk:The Writing's on the Wall/GA2

GA Review

Passed

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs)) 19:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

I told you I would review this one, let's go! --K. Peake 19:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Infobox looks good!
Merge the first para with the second para
"Lyrically, The Writing's on the Wall is constructed" → "Lyrically, the album is constructed"
Change the part about the two number one singles to starting with, "Two US Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles were produced" since the title is being overused in this para
"have listed The Writing's on the Wall" → "have listed the album"

Background and development

"who became the group's manager." → "who became their manager."
Second para looks good!

Recording and production

Quote box looks good!
"them into songs suitable for them." → "them into suitable songs."
Only use Whites' surname as she was identified in full previously
"to executive producer alongside Destiny's Child's manager Mathew Knowles," → "to executive producer alongside Mathew Knowles," as he was introduced earlier and keeping as is per MOS:SAMESURNAME
"a new mix to Mathew Knowles," → "a new mix to Knowles,"
"at The Hit Factory in New York City" → "at The Hit Factory in New York City (NYC)"
D'wayne Wiggins → D'Wayne Wiggins

Music and lyrics

Img and second para look good!
"the tone for the album" → "the tone for The Writing's on the Wall"

Marketing

Title and packaging

Good

Release and promotion

Img and second para look good!
"on April 24 further" → "on April 24, further"

Singles

First para looks good!
[59][51][60][61][53] should be moved around to be next to the countries since it is too many cluttered

Critical reception

First para looks good!
Consequence commentary should be last for thematic order

Accolades

Listings

Good

Awards and nominations

Remove the link for the 2000 Soul Train awards

Commercial performance

"the album registered a" → "The Writing's on the Wall registered a"
"In total, it spent" → "In total, The Writing's on the Wall spent"

Controversy

Img looks good!
Remove pipe on Monica
"On March 15," → "On March 15, 2000"
Second para looks good!

Impact and legacy

First para and img looks good!
"the group and Mathew Knowles." → "the group and Knowles."
Beyoncé should not be wikilinked
Wikilink The Guardian

Track listing

Good

Personnel

Good

Charts

Good

Certifications

Good

Release history

Good

References

Copyvio score is still too high at 55.9%; Grammy, Huffpost, Stereogum, and Pitchfork are the heaviest offenders
Billboard should be linked on the first two refs too
Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 21

Bibliography

Good

External links

Good

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed; that went very fast! --K. Peake 21:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have one question: why should New York City be accompanied by its abbreviation? Bronx Langford (talk) 18:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello sorry for the late reply - I forgot to note that while it should have its abbreviation on the first instance, then stylize it as NYC only on the second instance for better flow. K. Peake 20:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Other than that, is everything good? Bronx Langford (talk) 22:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bronx Langford It is quite moderate, but the Copyvio score is still above 40% so please cut down quoting. --K. Peake 16:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've cut down as much quoting as I can. Is the Copyvio score acceptable now? Bronx Langford (talk) 20:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kyle Peake? ― VAUGHAN J. (t · c) 07:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Pass now, sorry I took two days for this one! --K. Peake 11:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! Bronx Langford (talk) 18:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.