Talk:The Wizard of the Emerald City

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oz, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OzWikipedia:WikiProject OzTemplate:WikiProject OzOz articles

Novels: Fantasy Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Children's literature Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Russia: Language & literature Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the language and literature of Russia task force.

Copyright theft?

"Generally, people in the former Soviet Union seem aware that their beloved fairy tale is the product of copyright theft"

Whoever added this part about "copyright theft" and people "generally being aware of it" (and previously that "few are aware of it") didn't bother to back it up. Sounds like original research or POV to me.

Iamvalentine (talk) 17:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not so sure about that. I distinctly remember that I'm was told that the series resulted from a bet with a writer colleague, that he is able to write a best selling book in 6 months. Unfortunately he hadn't had a good idea, so he just stole the story of the Wizard of Oz. This was so successful, that he decided to develop the story further, which led to the other books of the series.

So if even I knew this as a child, I doubt that there was any illusion about the originality of the work.

--93.133.66.143 (talk) 00:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying the work was original. I'm sure the readers know it's an adaptation/loose translation; the article does say Baum was credited in the first books (AFAIR it was noted in the book I used to read as a child).

I'm just bothered with wording like "their beloved tale is a product of copyright theft". "Their beloved tale" almost sounds like the post-Soviet readers should feel ashamed of themselves. Can't see any legal decisions regarding theft either. No proof in the Links section. Anyway, Wizard of Oz is public domain now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamvalentine (talk • contribs) 15:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, none of Western authors of children's books published under their own names in 'legitimate' translations received any royalties throughout most of the Soviet history. Just because USSR did not have laws for doing it. So Volkov personally did not steal any copyright and did not specifically profit from publishing a Baum-based book as his own. If he had formally identified the publication as a translation, this would make absolutely no difference for Baum's heirs - they would not have received anything in any event. 176.15.77.168 (talk) 12:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Baum receiving royalties

The article says that Baum didn't receive royalties. Would be kind of hard for him to do so, considering he died in 1919 and the book wasn't published until 1939. Maybe it should say something about how his heirs never received royalties, but in any case it's lacking a source. Searched Google Books but didn't find anything about any attempts to sue or collect royalties.--Larrybob (talk) 18:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jus

According to Volkov's diary, „Jus“ origins from „Jealous“. But being actually rather „Envious“ than „Jealous“, „Urfin Jus“ is not a Meaningful Name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.195.19.41 (talk) 12:25, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]