Jump to content

Talk:The Wizard of Evergreen Terrace

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Wizard of Evergreen Terrace has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThe Wizard of Evergreen Terrace is part of the The Simpsons (season 10) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 3, 2010Good article nomineeListed
October 25, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Wizard of Evergreen Terrace/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:55, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    Well done.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    I have gone off and passed the article to GA, as I did not find anything troubling while reading the article. I would like to thank everyone who worked on the article for doing a fine job with describing the background and stuff. Congratulations on the hard effort. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review.

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:55, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! :) Theleftorium (talk) 23:09, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thank you, CTJF83 chat 02:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Information on Fermat's Last Theorem

[edit]

This mathematical tidbit that was placed into he episode - an apparent disproof of Fermat's theory that it is impossible for "x^3 + y^3 = z^3" - has a huge cultural impact, which should be mentioned in the article. An example of a source that could be used is at the Slate article Homer’s Last Theorem. I don't want to start tampering with a GA so I instead request this information be added.--Coin945 (talk) 13:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Wizard of Evergreen Terrace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Wizard of Evergreen Terrace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]