Talk:The Wizard of Evergreen Terrace
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Wizard of Evergreen Terrace article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The Wizard of Evergreen Terrace has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
The Wizard of Evergreen Terrace is part of the The Simpsons (season 10) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Wizard of Evergreen Terrace/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:55, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Well done.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- I have gone off and passed the article to GA, as I did not find anything troubling while reading the article. I would like to thank everyone who worked on the article for doing a fine job with describing the background and stuff. Congratulations on the hard effort. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review.
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:55, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! :) Theleftorium (talk) 23:09, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you, CTJF83 chat 02:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Information on Fermat's Last Theorem
[edit]This mathematical tidbit that was placed into he episode - an apparent disproof of Fermat's theory that it is impossible for "x^3 + y^3 = z^3" - has a huge cultural impact, which should be mentioned in the article. An example of a source that could be used is at the Slate article Homer’s Last Theorem. I don't want to start tampering with a GA so I instead request this information be added.--Coin945 (talk) 13:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The Wizard of Evergreen Terrace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090206232903/http://www.dvdtown.com/reviews/simpsons-the-the-complete-10th-season/5056 to http://www.dvdtown.com/reviews/simpsons-the-the-complete-10th-season/5056
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628224401/http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=eed3410e-93eb-4a5c-9631-b6185756c67f to http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=eed3410e-93eb-4a5c-9631-b6185756c67f
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Wizard of Evergreen Terrace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/entertainment/1998/09/18/1998-09-18__simpsons__still_hits_homers.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110517025000/http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/simpsonsseason10.php to http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/simpsonsseason10.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics The Simpsons (season 10) good content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- GA-Class The Simpsons articles
- Mid-importance The Simpsons articles
- GA-Class The Simpsons articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject The Simpsons articles
- GA-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- GA-Class Episode coverage articles
- Low-importance Episode coverage articles
- Episode coverage task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- GA-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- GA-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class American animation articles
- Low-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- GA-Class Animated television articles
- Low-importance Animated television articles
- Animated television work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles