Talk:The Wide Window
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Wide Window article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Question
[edit]" There they meet Captain Shame, who is actually Count Ola senoir in terrible disguise. The children try and warn Aunt Josephine"....
- How do they know? TheMadBaron 06:36, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Huh?
- If Count Olaf is in disguise, how do the children know it's him?
- (Please sign your comments.) TheMadBaron 01:28, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
- Count Olaf is very bad at disguising himself, but Aunt Josephine, having never seen Olaf, doesn't recognise him. smurrayinchester(User), (Ho Ho Ho!) 07:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
- It's a reccuring situation -at least at the first 7 books, excluding the first one- that Count Olaf shows up disguised extremely poorly, and only the children seem to recognise him. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Orthologist (talk • contribs) 17:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC).
Take a look at the 2008 Atlantic hurricane season article and you'll see why Josephine and Ike Anwhistle got their names.
- The book was written in 2000 so it's unlikely to be the reason for the choice of names.Nicole A. Jenkins (talk) 11:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Cover
[edit]THE COVER IS UP ON AMAZON.COM FOR "OR DISAPPEARENSE" SO CAN SOMEONE PLEASE PUT IT?
A reliable link, and a good-quality picture, can be found here: [1] 217.44.116.12 17:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'll add it.--CyberGhostface 20:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Plot Summary
[edit]Who took away the plot? I think that's vandalism. Can someone fix it for me?I like Snicket's books.--RoryReloaded 07:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Widewindownewcover.jpg
[edit]Image:Widewindownewcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NurseryRhyme (talk • BetacommandBot (talk) 05:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on The Wide Window. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071111033310/http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6431493.html to http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6431493.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)