A fact from The Wicked Prince appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 August 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Requested articles, because it is used for the administration of the Requested articles process or it was formerly listed at Requested articles.Requested articlesWikipedia:WikiProject Requested articlesTemplate:WikiProject Requested articlesRequested articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Schwarzenberger reminds us that the first dirigible with motors was in the air in 1852, some months after [the blockquote from a different story] was made. The Stone of the Wise Man (1858) and the later grotesque The Flea and the Professor (1872) deal with flying as well, while flights to other planets were seen as impossible; the uncanny fantasy The Wicked Prince, as early as 1840, could be added. The link is reasonably clear to me (a group of Andersen works dealing with motorized flight extremely early in its evolution, or prior to it). Is there an alternative word you'd prefer to describe what-kind-of-thing-is-flying? Vaticidalprophet21:43, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Vaticidalprophet: I think the source falters in a couple ways. First, it attributes inline to another's analysis – it's probably fine as long as the source it takes from is similarly published, but otherwise, we'll need to inline attribute ourselves. Second, the deal with flying as well doesn't necessarily mean that it's a dirigible (although this would be nitpicky if not for the next point). Third, the could be added tells me that this story in particular is more open to interpretation on how it manifests flight than the other mentioned stories. The link seems to be there, but not definitely – i mean, maybe we could soften the language in the hook to not say "depicts a dirigble"? That does make it explicit. A little unsure of how to proceed, open to suggestions :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 21:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So 'could be added' here is a bit of a sticking point, but I read that statement (in the context of other writing on this work) not as meaning "it's a borderline case", but "it's a very obscure one of Andersen's works so doesn't usually come to mind". I definitely understand where the former reading is coming from, but I didn't take it as the intent in the context of how this work is covered in general and as part of Andersen's body of literature. I agree softening the language is probably a reasonable way to square #2 and sidestep the debate over #3, but am not sure what phrasing works best ("depicts powered flight"?). Vaticidalprophet21:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It turned out the nominal wording was a little trickier than intended (damn Wright brothers, etc), but I think this is passable as both 'representative of the source' and 'factually accurate':