Talk:The Werewolf of Paris

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Faulty Summary

The original person who wrote this article obviously has not read the book themselves.Zverkov0 06:21, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TheWerewolfOfParisCover.jpg

Image:TheWerewolfOfParisCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Werewolf of Paris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728011254/http://www.theminnesotareview.org/journal/ns70/ramsey.shtml to http://www.theminnesotareview.org/journal/ns70/ramsey.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:30, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

This article is incomplete and consists mostly of a plot summary. More balanced coverage on the novel needs to be added to the article, with information on the author and the development of the novel added to the article (if any such information exists). More information on the novel's reception and legacy needs to be added to the article as well, with proper citations from reliable sources acompanying any new information added to the article. In the legacy section, there should be a sub-section briefly detailing each subsequent adaption, again accompanied with proper citations from reliable sources. Considering the amount of praise it's been given (some have placed it nalongside Frankenstein, Dracula, and The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde in terms of being a classic in Horror fiction), I'm surprised to see this article in the shape it's in (although not too surprised considering how those articles remain underdeveloped as well). Hopefully someone comes along and gives this article the attention it needs.--Paleface Jack 17:58, 12 February 2018 (UTC)