Talk:The Wages of Destruction

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Military history: Biography / Historiography / Technology / British / European / German / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Military historiography task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Reception

@GraemeLeggett Please explain what aspect of External links policy my edit fails. Cites to Professional Reviews are permitted, according to the WP Help material, despite having once upon a time been barred. Professional reviews seem to me a very helpful barometer of the Reception of the book. Pechmerle (talk) 06:30, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pechmerle: You didn't cite any particular reviews, you linked to a list of items returned by a search query at a website (which the added text said was reviews). Wikipedia policy on external links to avoid (at WP:LINKSTOAVOID) has as Item 9. "Any search results pages...". Further, the links I tested wanted an (institutional?) login which is number 6 on the Links to avoid list - "Sites that require payment or registration to view the relevant content, "

Further to that in my opinion, the list of links wasn't informative, even if they had the appropriate access a reader would have to select each in turn to find out what the content was.

Sheer numbers of reviews is a barometer of the number of reviews, it does not address the scope of reception - which might be limited to niche publications, and doesn't address quality of reviews. GraemeLeggett (talk) 10:04, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]