Talk:The Wachowskis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Wachowskis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 120 days

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Mid‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Mid-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Comics: Creators / United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comics creators work group.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

LGBTQ+ studies: Person

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans women. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.

If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBTQ+ WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Collaborators

Please note MOS:DONTHIDE (and also WP:PROSE). If tables are too large and bulky maybe they should be split out to other articles but hiding them is ... well literally just hiding the problem. I encourage editors to do something to improve this situation. -- 109.78.202.76 (talk) 01:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. I came to this article for the first time, looked at the two tables, and was wondering why they were there if they're empty - the "show" option is really easy to miss. I also can maybe see the rationale for collapsing the 'crew' section given its size, but the 'cast' one is fairly short, and having that shown would also alert new readers that the 'crew' one is probably filled as well, leading them to more likely see the "show" option for that table. Tagryn (talk) 19:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no picture?

A picture should be added to the header. It seems odd for a public figure/celebrity page not to have one 2A00:23C8:8308:EF01:1889:9ACD:6E73:4E67 (talk) 14:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a photo here now, but I'd update it? Mainly because it shows one of them pre-transition. It's harder to find an image of both of them in the same place though. DonutHog (talk) 12:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I looked and there simply isn't a single continuous shot of the sister post-transition.

In fact the manual of style page on gender identity remarks states that "Avoid using an out-of-date, pre-coming-out photo of a transgender subject as a lead image. If no other photos are available, it is generally better to have no lead image at all. In general, avoid using pre-coming-out photos unless the subject's pre-transition appearance is especially well-known and notable. The article about The Wachowskis, for example, is better without any pre-coming-out photos since the way they looked is not well known as they shied away from public appearances. Conversely, the Caitlyn Jenner article does contain photos from before her transition because she was a well known Olympic athlete, so her appearance at the time is relevant to the article, though none are in the lead section."

Perhaps it would be best to remove the photo entirely? JabbingQuirker (talk) 08:45, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the pic back to the body (it had been moved to the infobox in this edit). Since MOS:IDINFO calls this page out by name, I think we should lean towards the idea of there being a default consensus against pre-coming-out photos in the infobox (at least until there's further discussion). CambrianCrab (talk) 01:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add to solo projects: Lana wanted to return to the franchise after the death of her parents. She said on the topic: "My brain has always reached into my imagination and one night, I was crying and I couldn’t sleep, and my brain exploded this whole story. And I couldn’t have my mom and dad, yet suddenly I had Neo and Trinity, arguably the two most important characters in my life.”. Lily decided not to return for the same reason, on the topic she said "we started talking about it in between [our] dad dying and [our] mom dying, which was like five weeks apart. And there was something about the idea of going backward and being a part of something that I had done before that was expressly unappealing."<ref>

<ref>https://www.menshealth.com/entertainment/a38054404/lilly-wachowski-matrix-4-ressurections/ Izzyschuyler (talk) 03:25, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 09:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gender

Might wanna talk about their birth gender since thats what they were born as then mention that they transitioned and refer to them properly as him and him as children like they were not her and her. 73.133.31.228 (talk) 21:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Gender identity, gendered words including pronouns should reflect their most recent reliably reported self expression of gender, independent of the phase of their life described in the article. CloakedFerret (talk) 23:38, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 April 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Minor edit request. The first paragraph in the Personal Lives section (third sentence) has some duplicate text: "...that they had..." is repeated. Please remove the repeated words.

"In 2019, she said Mickey Ray Mahoney was now her partner and that they had that they had moved in together."

Thanks. BackspaceSomethingElse (talk) 15:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done General Ization ^Talk 15:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lilly Wachowski: Trash Mountain

Any chance we could add this in? https://variety.com/2024/film/news/lilly-wachowski-next-film-trash-mountain-caleb-hearon-1235908371/amp/ 86.44.172.205 (talk) 09:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prominence given to their deadnames

Even if their deadnames are associated with their professional work, why are the deadnames so prominent (currently in the very first sentence of the article)?

If at all the deadnames need to be specified, why can they not be mentioned in the "Early lives and careers" section or the "Film and television careers" section?

There is no justification for parading the deadnames so high up in the article. Splitpeasoup (talk) 01:21, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They were extremely notable under the names (perhaps more so than they are now). It's a similar case to Elliot Page given the prominence of the names. I don't see why we'd downplay that. — Czello ^(music) 08:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

kinda silly to not give them their own pages, is it not?

I mean they're different people 2607:FEA8:2BA0:5E00:32B9:4BEB:13A0:BD8F (talk) 23:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, that's what's silly here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.54.220.12 (talk) 17:33, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A significant amount of their work was done as a duo. It's reasonable to keep them together.CRBoyer 17:36, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]