Talk:The Violent Bear It Away

Novels High‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cleanup

Alright, I fixed this article up a little. I hope its alright. Caesar 23:41, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic or Protestant Themes?

The opening paragraph claims that this novel, like much other work of O'Connor, contains many Catholic themes, but (regardless of O'Connor being Catholic herself) they're actually fundamentalist-Protestant. Miss Tabitha 03:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to Francis Marion Tarwater, O'Connor says, "When you leave a man alone with his Bible and the Holy Ghost inspires him, he’s going to be a Catholic one way or another, even though he knows nothing about the visible church" (Habit of Being, p. 517). Biasedbulldog (talk) 02:47, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's debatable. I guess there really isn't anything specifically Catholic, and Tarwater is definetaly fundementalist. I would still label it as Catholic literature, however.

-Caesar

Fair use rationale for Image:FlanneryOConner TheViolentBearItAway.jpg

Image:FlanneryOConner TheViolentBearItAway.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FlanneryOConner TheViolentBearItAway.jpg

Image:FlanneryOConner TheViolentBearItAway.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Friend" and "Rapist" - Satan himself

These are not "possibly" incarnations of the devil. They most certainly are the devil, as O'Connor notes in The Habit of Being on pages 367 and 375. I changed the characters section to reflect this.

(I'd also argue that the drunk in the park by the fountain is probably Satan himself. He essentially echoes the friend's language, and he seems vaguely familiar to Tarwater. That's not absolutely clear, though.) Biasedbulldog (talk) 03:02, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Friend" and "Rapist" are the same character

The Rapist is the Friend in tangible form. He has the Friend's violet eyes, for instance. Johndburt (talk) 02:40, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's one interpretation. This is a novel, its meaning appears in interaction with its readers. WP should not baldly claim or insinuate that this is the only interpretation. However, it would be appropriate to put a sourced and cited claim like that in a section about interpretations, in particular if we can quote the author (just not in the plot summary). 149.7.163.134 (talk) 21:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary inaccuracy

The summary of the first chapter is actually a summary of the story "You Can't Be Any Poorer Than Dead," which is the basis of this chapter. However, the novel differs significantly from the story. I'm reluctant to rewrite it, but it is in urgent need of revision. Reading the chapter is all that's required to see that it is seriously misrepresented here. SpencerM (talk) 00:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Summary confusion

Francis is called "Francis" through three paragraphs of the summary. In the fourth paragraph he becomes "Tarwater," which is confusing. 60.102.230.200 (talk) 08:43, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]