Talk:The Valley of Gwangi

Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Westerns: Film Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Film task force.

bat winged pterosaur

The pterosaur in Gwangi does not match fossil pterosaurs in that it has bat-like wings (multiple "fingers") rather than single "finger" wings. Usually sourced to the difficulty of maintainingg the wing membrane of the model with just one supporting "finger". One could speculate the pterosaurs in the Valley were isolated and had 65 million years of additional evolution. For the purposes of the film, the pterosaur had to fly like an eagle, swooping down, snatching and lifting prey, rather than soar like a condor or albatross as was the probable flight mode with a single "finger" wing (as the pterosaur in 1925's "Lost World"). Naaman Brown (talk) 12:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: It appears that Harryhausen simply based his models on other creatures made for earlier films. The wing of a bat is supported by four fingers and that of the pterosaur is supported by the greatly elongated fourth digit - they are entirely separate structures that only look broadly similar due to convergent evolution. Model pterosaurs with the correct wings have been succesfully animated in other films - probably the best examples are those in Karel Zeman's 1955 children's feature Cesta do Praveku (Journey into Prehistory) which has superb pterosaur animation (the animals were based on the Zdenek Burian painings and if you freeze-frame the in-flight scenes, you can even see such details as the veins on the pterosaurs' necks). O'Brien's pterosaur in King Kong is shown swooping down eagle-like to grab Fay Wray and in brief combat with Kong in the Skull Mountain scene so I doubt that ease of animation was a factor for Harryhausen. Maxzden Jan 12 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxzden (talk • contribs) 17:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scarecrow and Mrs King

I have just seen several episodes where televisions appear, and they are not showing anything at all and are switched off. I have yet to find an episode where this movie is showing on a television. So "any time a television is shown" is outright wrong, and I am hard pressed to confirm that this movie appears at all. There is of course no source cited for this statement that I can use to verify it. Uncle G (talk) 12:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Who kissed whom?

The "Plot" section contains this sentence: "T.J. finally accepts Tuck when he saves Lope from a bull and the two kiss." As this is written, it seems to indicate that Tuck and Lope kiss. I presume that it's actually intended to be Tuck and T.J., but since I don't have the film for reference I can't be sure. Besides, I think it's funnier as-is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:8480:3343:607D:9E8C:9370:1DBE (talk) 07:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We are not trying to be funny here, we are trying to be encyclopedic. I've fixed that. Thank you for pointing that out. Wastrel Way (talk) Eric

As originally written, it sounds like Lope and the bull are the ones who kiss. Mehendri Solon (talk) 23:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Credits

The final credit in the movie is "Gwangi" and I suggest adding "Gwangi as himself" (or itself) to the cast. It's right there. The movie is downloadable at archive.org. Wastrel Way (talk) 02:11, 9 November 2022 (UTC) Eric[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:37, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]